Skip to content

An old magazine ad from Orbis caught my …

An old magazine ad from Orbis caught my attention. To see differently you have to think differently, the ad reads. I wondered what it would look like to reverse it, to change the perspective: to think differently you have to see differently. Reversing it shifts the site of change. The original phrase assumes thought goes...

Clay Lowe
Sep 28, 20261 min read

n old magazine ad from Orbis caught my attention. To see differently you have to think differently, the ad reads. I wondered what it would look like to reverse it, to change the perspective: to think differently you have to see differently.

Reversing it shifts the site of change. The original phrase assumes thought goes first. Change the concept, the belief, the frame, and perception follows. The reversal suggests that thought begins further upstream. Before the argument, before the interpretation, there is attention: what you notice, what you overlook, what your habits have rendered invisible.

This makes seeing a practice rather than a passive act. You change where you stand. You slow down. You enter someone else’s environment. You look at the familiar until it becomes strange again. New thought emerges because different evidence has presented itself.

The reversal also reveals a loop:

We see through the structures of our thinking,
yet our thinking can only work with what we have learned to see.

Perhaps the real question is not which comes first, but how we interrupt the circuit. Sometimes a new idea changes the world before our eyes. Sometimes an encounter reorganises thought without asking permission.

To think differently, then, we may need to design conditions in which different things can become visible.

Did you enjoy this article?

Recommend it — Standard Reader surfaces well-loved writing to more readers across the network.

Across the AtmosphereDiscussions